PRSM
Managed KYC · OSINT · financial-crime risk

Evidence-led intelligence for high-stakes due diligence.

PRSM turns KYC and OSINT investigation into a traceable, human-reviewed, reusable system. Submit a person or entity and receive an analyst-grade report where every material finding traces to its evidence.

  • Traceable to source
  • Human-reviewed
  • Direct & indirect exposure
RISK SENTINEL REPORT
Illustrative
Subject Entity profile REF · PRSM-2417 · cross-jurisdiction
QA approved
SAN Sanctions
No adverse finding
JUR Jurisdiction
Elevated
REP Reputational
Signal — under review
GOV Governance
Limited public signal
Indirect exposure detected via 2-hop ownership path — relationship map attached.
14 evidence records Source-traced

High-stakes diligence fails when research lives across browser tabs, raw exports, and analyst notes. PRSM makes it structured, defensible, and reusable.

The problem

Commodity screening flags matches. It rarely explains them.

The hard part of due diligence isn’t finding a hit — it’s judging what it means, proving where it came from, and saying so without overclaiming.

Fragmented & hard to defend

Evidence scattered across tools and tabs collapses the moment a board, regulator, or court asks how you know.

Relationships go unseen

List checks miss indirect exposure — the ownership and trade paths where real counterparty risk usually lives.

Signals become “facts”

Weak or translated media gets reported as conclusions. A defensible report keeps confidence and uncertainty visible.

How it works

Five steps from a name to a defensible report

A plain-English service flow, run on a managed investigation workflow. Source checks feed an investigator; nothing reaches the report until evidence backs it and QA approves it.

  1. 01

    Identity verification

    Resolve who the subject actually is.

    Submitted names and identifiers are preserved exactly, then reconciled against aliases, transliterations, registry IDs, and dates — evidence-led, never an unsupported automatic match.

  2. 02

    OSINT review

    Search the open record, with discipline.

    Open-source signals across sites, platforms, and networks are gathered as evidence for an investigator to weigh — not scraped into conclusions.

  3. 03

    AML & sanctions screening

    Check the lists that carry legal weight.

    Watchlist, sanctions, entity-list, and PEP signals feed investigator review. Direct hits and adjacency are kept distinct, with the source behind each one.

  4. 04

    Media & image capture

    Preserve the source before it moves.

    Adverse media, court material, and reverse-image findings are captured and timestamped as evidence — a record you can return to, not a screenshot that rots.

  5. 05

    Secure delivery

    A report you can defend.

    After QA review and approval, the report is delivered to a tenant-scoped portal: every material finding cites its evidence, with confidence and directness stated.

Report anatomy

A report that reads like intelligence — not a search export

PRSM reports synthesize public, governmental, and open-source material into decision support. Each section is built to be read by a board, a regulator, or opposing counsel.

Direct vs. indirect, never blurred

A direct finding means the subject itself appears in a source. Indirect exposure runs through ownership, directorship, or trade relationships — and is labeled with its hop count. We never collapse a two-hop path into a direct match.

Direct finding Indirect · 2 hops No adverse finding found No sufficient public signal
  • 01

    Executive summary

    Decision-support overview, not a raw dump.

  • 02

    Subject & identity

    Profile, aliases, identifiers, transliterations.

  • 03

    Risk category table

    Each category explained in plain English.

  • 04

    Direct findings

    What the subject is directly tied to, with evidence.

  • 05

    Indirect exposure

    Relationship-path risk, with hop counts.

  • 06

    Relationship map

    How the exposure actually connects.

  • 07

    Evidence summary

    Every claim traceable to a source record.

  • 08

    Source coverage

    What was checked — and the limits of each source.

  • 09

    Unresolved questions

    What is uncertain, stated plainly.

  • 10

    Recommended follow-up

    The next screening worth running.

Source coverage

Across the families of sources that matter

Investigations draw on public, governmental, open-source, and approved data. Each finding records which source supports it — and what the source can and cannot tell you.

  • Sanctions lists
  • Watchlists
  • Entity lists
  • Politically exposed persons
  • Adverse media
  • Court & legal records
  • Law-enforcement sources
  • Financial records
  • Social & open web
  • Image & reverse-image

Source families are shown as coverage categories that feed human review. PRSM does not represent these as live integrations, exclusive licensing, or exhaustive coverage, and does not treat absence of a signal as proof of absence of risk.

Why PRSM

A managed service, delivered as a compounding product

The investigation isn’t just a report at the end. It’s structured intelligence that makes the next case faster, more consistent, and easier to defend.

Evidence, not assertions

Every material finding carries its source, collection timestamp, confidence, and whether the exposure is direct or indirect.

Direct vs. indirect, kept honest

A two-hop relationship is never presented as a direct match. Exposure paths and hop counts stay visible where they matter.

Human-in-the-loop

Investigators and QA reviewers approve findings and reports. Automation assists; it never confirms a claim or delivers on its own.

Reusable intelligence

Confirmed people, entities, aliases, identifiers, and relationships compound across cases — the third look at a known party is faster than the first.

Security & trust

Sensitive diligence, handled like it matters

Tenant-scoped access, private evidence storage, short-lived evidence links, role-based permissions, and audit logging for sensitive actions are core product principles — not afterthoughts.

How we handle data

Start here

Bring us a name. Get a defensible answer.

Tell us the person or entity, the decision in front of you, and the jurisdictions involved. We’ll scope an evidence-backed review and walk you through it.

Human-reviewed. Evidence-backed. Handled with tenant-scoped confidentiality.